Description

Accordingly, the trial was conducted in the Court of Second Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur and ultimately by judgment dated 26.11.2018, the accused Rakesh Yadav was acquitted from the aforesaid offences extending benefit of doubt. However, in Para 34, 35 and 36 of the judgment, the learned Trial Court has made certain adverse remarks against the petitioner, pursuant to which, a departmental inquiry vide Annexure P-2 was initiated against her for defective investigation, which is sought to be challenged by way of this writ petition. Reply has been filed opposing the writ petition stating that the observations made are strictly in accordance with law.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Within two years we
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
The wide canvas so spread need
Words: 1220 | Time: 50 mins
Legal Dictation
Learned counsel for the parties
Words: 498 | Time: 25 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
It has been further asserted by
Words: 1194 | Time: 50 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-22 Dictation
Ex.483, Sir, I must thank the hon. Mover
Words: 833 | Time: 40 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-2 Dictation
Ex. 35, Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, I welcome
Words: 832 | Time: 40 mins