Description

That eye witnesses are not consistent. Evidence of informant and his wife is full of material omissions. Recovery is doubtful. There are allegations of pelting stones. Roles are not clearly defined and therefore, according to learned counsel, learned trial Judge ought not to have accepted the prosecution version. That, panchas to recovery have not supported.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Punjab and Haryana High Court
Words: 509 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-22 Dictation
Ex.475, Sir, while speaking yesterday, I
Words: 838 | Time: 50 mins
NCLT Exams Dictation
These Appeals have been
Words: 553 | Time: 27 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
Their presence would at the most
Words: 1238 | Time: 40 mins
General Dictation
It has been observed recently
Words: 499 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
One of the things I want
Words: 581 | Time: 27 mins