The plaintiffs claim that the Indian Defendant No. 2 Company is under the control of wrong doers. They further claim that Defendant Nos. 8 to 10 were in active collusion with Defendant Nos. 3 to 7 and that they have joined hands to deprive Defendant No. 2 of its beneficial interest in the suit shares namely 6% of shares of the Indian Company.
| Rank | Students | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Erin Gonzales |
250/300 |
| #2 |
Erin Gonzales |
220/300 |
| #3 |
Erin Gonzales |
200/300 |
| #4 |
Erin Gonzales |
150/300 |