Description

Recently (on July 09), the Supreme Court observed that where an order of bail does not furnish reasons behind the decision taken, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind. "Where an order refusing or granting bail does not furnish the reasons that inform the decision, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind which may require the intervention of this Court. The three-judge bench observed thus while setting aside the Jharkhand High Court's order granting bail to an accused of a murder.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
These days media channels are becoming
Words: 498 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-3 Dictation
Ex.65, The honourable Member who
Words: 837 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
But in some places its progress was held up by courts
Words: 496 | Time: 25 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
The foregoing problem indicates
Words: 503 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Supreme Court recently directed
Words: 512 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-1 Dictation
Ex.22 back, For that all efforts should be made more fertilizers
Words: 405 | Time: 25 mins