Description

Recently (on July 09), the Supreme Court observed that where an order of bail does not furnish reasons behind the decision taken, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind. "Where an order refusing or granting bail does not furnish the reasons that inform the decision, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind which may require the intervention of this Court. The three-judge bench observed thus while setting aside the Jharkhand High Court's order granting bail to an accused of a murder.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Legal Dictation
The Central Government on
Words: 498 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
It is manifest that to constitute
Words: 521 | Time: 25 mins
NCLT Exams Dictation
We have heard the Learned
Words: 519 | Time: 27 mins
Legal Dictation
Per contra, learned counsel for
Words: 509 | Time: 26 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
One of the things I want
Words: 581 | Time: 27 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-20 Dictation
In the first place, so
Words: 838 | Time: 40 mins