Description

The Supreme Court reiterated that an application under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, can be filed before the Trial Court even if the decree for specific performance was passed by the Appellate Court. Referring to the precedent Guptan vs. Avara (1994) 2 SCC 642 and Chettiar Firm vs. and Another (1999) 4 SCC 702, the Court observed: in our view, the expression may apply in the same suit in which the decree is made as used in Section 28 of the 1963 Act must be accorded an expansive meaning so as to include the Court of first instance even though the decree under execution is passed by the Appellate Court.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Legal Dictation
As per plaintiffs, they had
Words: 493 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Thank you, Speaker Sir. I have a similar question
Words: 814 | Time: 40 mins
Legal Dictation
On coming to know of the said
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
A writ petition has been filed in the
Words: 516 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
We will explore the idea of why poets
Words: 515 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
After all we are aiming at the socia
Words: 497 | Time: 25 mins