Description

The Supreme Court reiterated that an application under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, can be filed before the Trial Court even if the decree for specific performance was passed by the Appellate Court. Referring to the precedent Guptan vs. Avara (1994) 2 SCC 642 and Chettiar Firm vs. and Another (1999) 4 SCC 702, the Court observed: in our view, the expression may apply in the same suit in which the decree is made as used in Section 28 of the 1963 Act must be accorded an expansive meaning so as to include the Court of first instance even though the decree under execution is passed by the Appellate Court.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

General Dictation
Assessing children in completing their homework
Words: 496 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
Despite the continued efforts of
Words: 515 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Being Aggrieved by the
Words: 555 | Time: 27 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-3 Dictation
Ex. 57, First of all I would like
Words: 837 | Time: 40 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Technology is the branch of
Words: 509 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
That Payment of Gratuity is a
Words: 507 | Time: 25 mins