Description

The Supreme Court held that a party whose right to file a written statement in a case has been forfeited cannot introduce his case indirectly through evidence or written submission. Such a party can still participate in the proceedings and cross-examine the complainant, but cannot indirectly introduce his case.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
It appears that the dispute
Words: 521 | Time: 27 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-2 Dictation
Ex.36, Madam, Deputy Chairman, I welcome
Words: 836 | Time: 40 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-1 Dictation
Ex. 20 back, So all these difficulties were there in the Home Minister. But I
Words: 425 | Time: 25 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
When any person not under
Words: 515 | Time: 25 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
I am absolutely in the dark as
Words: 499 | Time: 25 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
While dealing with a batch
Words: 503 | Time: 25 mins