Steno Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation No. 659
The Supreme Court held548
Words110
Wpm27
Min0
Attempts5
CoinsDescription
The Supreme Court held that a party whose right to file a written statement in a case has been forfeited cannot introduce his case indirectly through evidence or written submission. Such a party can still participate in the proceedings and cross-examine the complainant, but cannot indirectly introduce his case.
Leaderboard
| Rank | Students | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
250/300 |
| #2 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
220/300 |
| #3 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
200/300 |
| #4 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
150/300 |
| #5 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
230/300 |
| #6 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
270/300 |
| #7 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
270/300 |
| #8 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
270/300 |
| #9 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
270/300 |
| #10 |
Erin Gonzales+91 95134 XXXXX |
270/300 |
Available Exams
Kailash Chandra Vol-1 Dictation
Sir, Before the House adjourned for lunch
Words: 400 |
Time: 25 mins