Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Kailash Chandra Vol-3 Dictation
Ex. 56, Madam, Chairman, I am
Words: 831 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Madras High Court recently observed t
Words: 497 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
large part of the work of a modern government
Words: 833 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
These days media channels are becoming
Words: 498 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
Earlier because we were in the front of the freedom
Words: 526 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Supreme Court recently
Words: 580 | Time: 27 mins