Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
I now take this opportunity of payin
Words: 485 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
Environmental problems have
Words: 613 | Time: 30 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Sir, another section of the
Words: 850 | Time: 40 mins
General Dictation
It is said that individuals who
Words: 503 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The phrase we are only so blind as we want to be suggests
Words: 512 | Time: 25 mins
NCLT Exams Dictation
The Respondent No. 1 was
Words: 521 | Time: 26 mins