Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
They did not have access to earlier
Words: 516 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
We know that a sound is a form
Words: 500 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
At this stage, leaned counsel
Words: 502 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Sir, last one which the Finance Minister has
Words: 819 | Time: 40 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
I have heard learned counsel for
Words: 1183 | Time: 50 mins
Legal Dictation
The position that emerges from
Words: 523 | Time: 25 mins