Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Having the knowledge
Words: 569 | Time: 27 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
Artificial Intelligence (AI) now enables t
Words: 507 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
A personality is how one
Words: 512 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-1 Dictation
Ex. 15 back When it came to the question of practical implementation
Words: 441 | Time: 25 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied
Words: 491 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-24 Dictation
Ex.524, Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, the
Words: 794 | Time: 40 mins