Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
However, the police came looking
Words: 1199 | Time: 50 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-2 Dictation
Ex.44, Mr. Vice-Chairman, the Minister
Words: 833 | Time: 40 mins
General Dictation
And on every promise they have
Words: 489 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
According to the Global Hunger
Words: 501 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Within two years we
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
The Supreme Court today (October 18) cancelled the
Words: 501 | Time: 25 mins