Description

Today, Mr. Drupad Patil, learned counsel for the respondent fairly states that the date referred to in these applications was indeed erroneous and that there had been no consideration of the respondent's case in the meeting held on December 21, 2019. Mr Patil strenuously urges that MCGM should be allowed to file a further affidavit in the matter. His request is primarily based on the desire to set the record straight on the actual date of the decisions of the Appeal Committee.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Sir, all in the country are now
Words: 504 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Sir, last one which the Finance Minister has
Words: 819 | Time: 40 mins
Legal Dictation
As per plaintiffs, they had
Words: 493 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Supreme Court today (June 28)
Words: 502 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
It may boost investment but within
Words: 510 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
The Calcutta High Court on
Words: 508 | Time: 25 mins