Description

Recently (on July 09), the Supreme Court observed that where an order of bail does not furnish reasons behind the decision taken, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind. "Where an order refusing or granting bail does not furnish the reasons that inform the decision, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind which may require the intervention of this Court. The three-judge bench observed thus while setting aside the Jharkhand High Court's order granting bail to an accused of a murder.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
Learned counsel for appellant pointed out
Words: 1228 | Time: 50 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Provided some kind of a reasoned approach
Words: 528 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
As the passenger footfall is increasing
Words: 828 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
Taking judicial notice of the highest ever temperature
Words: 502 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
Though the present suit is filed
Words: 509 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
The Supreme Court today (October 18) cancelled the
Words: 501 | Time: 25 mins