Description

Recently (on July 09), the Supreme Court observed that where an order of bail does not furnish reasons behind the decision taken, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind. "Where an order refusing or granting bail does not furnish the reasons that inform the decision, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind which may require the intervention of this Court. The three-judge bench observed thus while setting aside the Jharkhand High Court's order granting bail to an accused of a murder.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
I think, the House in its collective
Words: 499 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Sir, it is true that when
Words: 509 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
Gender Sensitivity denotes the act of acknowledging t
Words: 504 | Time: 25 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
By the said judgment impugned
Words: 1216 | Time: 50 mins
NCLT Exams Dictation
It is further submitted that
Words: 528 | Time: 27 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, the House is
Words: 787 | Time: 40 mins