Description

Recently (on July 09), the Supreme Court observed that where an order of bail does not furnish reasons behind the decision taken, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind. "Where an order refusing or granting bail does not furnish the reasons that inform the decision, there is a presumption of the non-application of mind which may require the intervention of this Court. The three-judge bench observed thus while setting aside the Jharkhand High Court's order granting bail to an accused of a murder.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Kailash Chandra Vol-2 Dictation
Ex.42, Sir, the Resolution itself is
Words: 834 | Time: 40 mins
Legal Dictation
The Supreme Court refused
Words: 499 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Provided some kind of a reasoned approach
Words: 528 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
Though every step would be conditioned to that end.
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Provision of efficient and world class infrastructure
Words: 795 | Time: 40 mins
General Dictation
The concept of philanthropy and
Words: 512 | Time: 25 mins