Description

In the judgment it is seen that the Supreme Court held it is the Distributor who can refer the matter to arbitration and not the respondent and as such set aside the judgment of the High Court appointing the Arbitrator. The issue before the Supreme Court was not with regard to whether there is any arbitration clause but who can invoke the arbitration clause.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
In her speech, she praised London's legacy of mediation,
Words: 604 | Time: 30 mins
Legal Dictation
The Calcutta High Court on
Words: 508 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
In addition to the equality clause
Words: 505 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-3 Dictation
Ex. 55, As far as Khadi is concerned
Words: 839 | Time: 40 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
The Central Government on
Words: 1230 | Time: 50 mins