Description

Appellant stated that as per mutual understanding two Directors of Appellant No.1 and one Director of 2nd Respondent was appointed. Appellant stated that several disputes arose between 1st Appellant and 2nd Respondent and 2nd Respondent kept trying to oust the 1st Appellant from the business

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are considering the Finance Bill
Words: 838 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
On a favorable statement being made by
Words: 508 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Supreme Court on Monday asked
Words: 504 | Time: 25 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
In addition to the equality clause
Words: 1218 | Time: 50 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Being Aggrieved by the
Words: 555 | Time: 27 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
We have come a long way since
Words: 487 | Time: 25 mins