Description

Appellant stated that as per mutual understanding two Directors of Appellant No.1 and one Director of 2nd Respondent was appointed. Appellant stated that several disputes arose between 1st Appellant and 2nd Respondent and 2nd Respondent kept trying to oust the 1st Appellant from the business

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Legal Dictation
The Police is directed to follow
Words: 506 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Hon. Speaker, Sir, I would like to know from the hon. Minister
Words: 840 | Time: 40 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Learned Additional Public
Words: 530 | Time: 27 mins
Legal Dictation
After filing of charge sheet, this
Words: 503 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
When she told that she wanted to
Words: 500 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
In this appeal on order
Words: 838 | Time: 40 mins