Description

Appellant stated that as per mutual understanding two Directors of Appellant No.1 and one Director of 2nd Respondent was appointed. Appellant stated that several disputes arose between 1st Appellant and 2nd Respondent and 2nd Respondent kept trying to oust the 1st Appellant from the business

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Kailash Chandra Vol-23 Dictation
Ex.499, The demands of science are very
Words: 834 | Time: 40 mins
General Dictation
Another serious allegation has
Words: 499 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
The Calcutta High Court on
Words: 508 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Prime Minister was
Words: 524 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud highlighted the
Words: 506 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
What are the advantages and
Words: 510 | Time: 25 mins