Description

Appellant stated that as per mutual understanding two Directors of Appellant No.1 and one Director of 2nd Respondent was appointed. Appellant stated that several disputes arose between 1st Appellant and 2nd Respondent and 2nd Respondent kept trying to oust the 1st Appellant from the business

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Supreme Court removed
Words: 578 | Time: 26 mins
Legal Dictation
The accused, in his statement
Words: 510 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
The Supreme Court on Tuesday
Words: 503 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-23 Dictation
Ex.491, Sir, I know for some time past
Words: 837 | Time: 40 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
It a little over a year now since
Words: 795 | Time: 40 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud highlighted the
Words: 506 | Time: 25 mins