Description

Appellant stated that as per mutual understanding two Directors of Appellant No.1 and one Director of 2nd Respondent was appointed. Appellant stated that several disputes arose between 1st Appellant and 2nd Respondent and 2nd Respondent kept trying to oust the 1st Appellant from the business

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

NCLT Exams Dictation
Appellant stated that as per
Words: 506 | Time: 26 mins
General Dictation
So only one type of fertilizer,
Words: 507 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Supreme Court on Monday asked
Words: 504 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-2 Dictation
Ex.26 Mr. Vice-Chairman, I would now like to make
Words: 839 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Supreme Court held that in the event of an alteration of charges,
Words: 610 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently refused
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins