Description

Appellant stated that as per mutual understanding two Directors of Appellant No.1 and one Director of 2nd Respondent was appointed. Appellant stated that several disputes arose between 1st Appellant and 2nd Respondent and 2nd Respondent kept trying to oust the 1st Appellant from the business

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Kailash Chandra Vol-2 Dictation
Ex.42, Sir, the Resolution itself is
Words: 834 | Time: 40 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Congress failed
Words: 558 | Time: 26 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
It is obvious that one of the major
Words: 789 | Time: 40 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Within two years we
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins
NCLT Exams Dictation
The Respondent No. 1 was
Words: 521 | Time: 26 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
A district consumer disputes redressal
Words: 509 | Time: 25 mins