Steno Legal Dictation No. 354

The argument of the learned counsel for appellant was that the Court below failed to appreciate that under the provision of Section 34(3) of the Act of 1996 the period of Limitation was extendable by 30 days if the party was able to show that it was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within the prescribed period of 3 months. In the present case, the Court below although discussed the provision of Section 34(3) of the Act of 1996, it failed to put it in application and extend the period of limitation by another 30 days, which had already expired on 18.04.2023 under the calculation of 90 days limitation period.