Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

General Dictation
The prevalence of illegal music
Words: 500 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Sir, I beg to move for leave
Words: 845 | Time: 40 mins
Legal Dictation
The Supreme Court set aside the
Words: 529 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
One of the things I want
Words: 581 | Time: 27 mins
Legal Dictation
The Supreme Court today constituted a Special
Words: 522 | Time: 25 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
When any person not under
Words: 515 | Time: 25 mins