Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Election Commission of India
Words: 511 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
There is no doubt that teachers
Words: 517 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
When individuals are free to pursue
Words: 508 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
After the technical glitches that were flagged by the candidates appearing
Words: 604 | Time: 30 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-1 Dictation
Sir, Before the House adjourned for lunch
Words: 400 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
Viewed in this perspective, it
Words: 597 | Time: 30 mins