Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
In the last few months the
Words: 515 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
In the last one year our country
Words: 783 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Supreme Court on Friday (May 17)
Words: 511 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-24 Dictation
Ex.507, Honourable Members, I welcome
Words: 805 | Time: 40 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
The Ministry has taken care to foster regional languages
Words: 833 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
Students who graduate from a
Words: 603 | Time: 25 mins