Description

Having been noticed from the trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No. 43 of 1977, the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 contested the same by filing their joint written statement denying the allegations alleged by the plaintiff against them taking their stands that, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable under law. The plaintiff has no cause of action to bring the suit. The suit of the plaintiff is hit under Section 11 of the C.P.C. and the notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. issued by the plaintiff against them is not legal, valid and sufficient.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Supreme Court today (June 25)
Words: 503 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
I am delighted to be with this distinguished audience at the 86th Annual Session
Words: 787 | Time: 40 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-3 Dictation
Ex.53, Mr. Speaker, Sir, yesterday
Words: 832 | Time: 40 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
Considering the rival contentions
Words: 1093 | Time: 50 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
A writ petition has been filed in the
Words: 516 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
Someone has rightly said, that
Words: 532 | Time: 25 mins