Description

Needless to say that raising the illegal constructions by the private party on the land owned by the private party it is a private cause and vendetta between the petitioner and the Respondent Nos. 3 to 7, which involves several disputed questions of facts and it can not be decided without oral as well as documentary evidence about raising illegal/unauthorised constructions on private property of the petitioner therefore, as law laid down in case of City and Industrial Development Corporation (supra), writ jurisdiction 5 of 6 WP 9741-2024 judgment under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not amenable.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

General Dictation
A highly controversial issue
Words: 499 | Time: 25 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
The High Court by its impugned
Words: 507 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
Someone has rightly said, that
Words: 532 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-21 Dictation
Ex.462, Mr. Chairman, I rise to support
Words: 838 | Time: 50 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to
Words: 607 | Time: 30 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The ICDS is not meant
Words: 570 | Time: 27 mins