Description

Today, Mr. Drupad Patil, learned counsel for the respondent fairly states that the date referred to in these applications was indeed erroneous and that there had been no consideration of the respondent's case in the meeting held on December 21, 2019. Mr Patil strenuously urges that MCGM should be allowed to file a further affidavit in the matter. His request is primarily based on the desire to set the record straight on the actual date of the decisions of the Appeal Committee.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Madam Speaker, our ecology
Words: 825 | Time: 50 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
In addition to the equality clause
Words: 1218 | Time: 50 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
The Survey Commission of Waqf
Words: 1184 | Time: 50 mins
General Dictation
Many people agree that TV
Words: 606 | Time: 30 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-3 Dictation
Ex.60, During the last general
Words: 831 | Time: 40 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
We stand in the middle
Words: 866 | Time: 40 mins