Description

Today, Mr. Drupad Patil, learned counsel for the respondent fairly states that the date referred to in these applications was indeed erroneous and that there had been no consideration of the respondent's case in the meeting held on December 21, 2019. Mr Patil strenuously urges that MCGM should be allowed to file a further affidavit in the matter. His request is primarily based on the desire to set the record straight on the actual date of the decisions of the Appeal Committee.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

General Dictation
Earth is struggling with the
Words: 603 | Time: 30 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
It has also been contended
Words: 511 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
The Allahabad High Court has
Words: 592 | Time: 30 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
To buttress his contention
Words: 503 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
The Supreme Court today (on August 12)
Words: 572 | Time: 27 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
We are now in the middle of the 55 years
Words: 488 | Time: 25 mins