Description

Today, Mr. Drupad Patil, learned counsel for the respondent fairly states that the date referred to in these applications was indeed erroneous and that there had been no consideration of the respondent's case in the meeting held on December 21, 2019. Mr Patil strenuously urges that MCGM should be allowed to file a further affidavit in the matter. His request is primarily based on the desire to set the record straight on the actual date of the decisions of the Appeal Committee.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Legal Dictation
Recently, the Supreme Court
Words: 494 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
I am pleased to be in the midst of you at
Words: 801 | Time: 40 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
So, I request the Government
Words: 500 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
Per contra, learned counsel for the Respondent
Words: 513 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
It is often argued by some people
Words: 506 | Time: 25 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded in
Words: 1144 | Time: 50 mins