That eye witnesses are not consistent. Evidence of informant and his wife is full of material omissions. Recovery is doubtful. There are allegations of pelting stones. Roles are not clearly defined and therefore, according to learned counsel, learned trial Judge ought not to have accepted the prosecution version. That, panchas to recovery have not supported.
| Rank | Students | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Erin Gonzales |
250/300 |
| #2 |
Erin Gonzales |
220/300 |
| #3 |
Erin Gonzales |
200/300 |
| #4 |
Erin Gonzales |
150/300 |