Description

That eye witnesses are not consistent. Evidence of informant and his wife is full of material omissions. Recovery is doubtful. There are allegations of pelting stones. Roles are not clearly defined and therefore, according to learned counsel, learned trial Judge ought not to have accepted the prosecution version. That, panchas to recovery have not supported.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
From the evidence of P.W. Nos. 4,
Words: 1181 | Time: 50 mins
General Dictation
So many people believe that the
Words: 602 | Time: 30 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Madam Speaker, our ecology
Words: 825 | Time: 50 mins
General Dictation
And these white-skinned people
Words: 507 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-24 Dictation
Ex.527, Sir, there are three factors
Words: 838 | Time: 50 mins
Legal Dictation
The Madhya Pradesh High Court
Words: 604 | Time: 30 mins