Description

Because the impugned order does not appreciate that the Conveyance Deed dated 14.07.2014 has been executed in favour of the Respondent No. 1 by way of fabricating and forging the Dissolution Deed dated 31.03.2000.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
Investigation was carried out and
Words: 1184 | Time: 50 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-1 Dictation
Ex.11 back, The hon. Member also suggested
Words: 411 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
Though the present suit is filed
Words: 509 | Time: 25 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-24 Dictation
Ex.517, Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, before
Words: 796 | Time: 40 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-2 Dictation
Ex.40, It was suggested by the
Words: 831 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
After the technical glitches that were flagged by the candidates appearing
Words: 604 | Time: 30 mins