Description

It is contended that the learned Tribunal has erred while assessing oral and Page No. 4/16 documentary evidence of the petitioner by not taking into consideration Exhibit Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 and by discarding Annexure 1 without assigning any valid reasons

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
Mr. Dessai appearing for the
Words: 1263 | Time: 50 mins
General Dictation
Creativity is the reflection of
Words: 508 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
Per contra, learned counsel for the Respondent
Words: 513 | Time: 25 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
Both the sides led evidence in
Words: 1210 | Time: 50 mins
Legal Dictation
In an extraordinary Sunday
Words: 511 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
This policy may not affect them very much
Words: 509 | Time: 25 mins