It is contended that the learned Tribunal has erred while assessing oral and Page No. 4/16 documentary evidence of the petitioner by not taking into consideration Exhibit Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 and by discarding Annexure-1 without assigning any valid reasons.
| Rank | Students | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Erin Gonzales |
250/300 |
| #2 |
Erin Gonzales |
220/300 |
| #3 |
Erin Gonzales |
200/300 |
| #4 |
Erin Gonzales |
150/300 |