Description

Learned Counsel for the Appellant appearing for SEML submitted that the Adjudicating Authority committed an error in passing the Order dated 06.10.2023. It is submitted that the Adjudicating Authority while examining the Resolution Plan is circumscribed by Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short the Code) and legislature has not endowed the Adjudicating Authority with the jurisdiction or authority to analyse or evaluate the commercial wisdom of the CoC. The Adjudicating Authority is required to evaluate the plan on the touchstone of Section 30(2) read with Section 31 of the Code. Adjudicating Authority is not required to examine the correctness of the decision taken by the CoC, as the decision to approve the Resolution Plan lies solely with the CoC in their commercial wisdom.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Legal Dictation
Investigation was carried out and
Words: 484 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Mr. Chairman, Sir, I rise to support
Words: 841 | Time: 40 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently refused
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
The Supreme Court recently set
Words: 579 | Time: 30 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
It is contended that the learned
Words: 1187 | Time: 50 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Election Commission of India
Words: 511 | Time: 25 mins