Description

Two contradictory arguments of the Bank cannot run side by side that on one hand the action was taken on account of default committed as identified in the impugned RBI Guidelines and now on the other hand saying that the said RBI Guidelines should not be made the basis for quashing of the proceedings because only those cases are to be covered which are having exposure Rs. 20 billion or above and since in the present case the debt as per Bank of India Petition under Section 7 of the I&B Code in the capacity of Financial Creditor is much below therefore, legally not to be quashed. This plea of the Bank is not sustainable in the eyes of law because if it was so, then why the Banks have asked for a Resolution of the debt under the compliance of impugned guidelines of the RBI.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Kerala High Court recently observed
Words: 506 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
Recently (on July 09), th
Words: 546 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
So only one type of fertilizer,
Words: 507 | Time: 25 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
By the said judgment impugned
Words: 1216 | Time: 50 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-2 Dictation
Ex.23 back, This shows that fourteen times that
Words: 435 | Time: 25 mins
Judgment Writer 2024 (JW) Dictation
The accused, in his statement
Words: 1210 | Time: 50 mins