Description

Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned APP for the State. Perused the investigation papers as well as the recitals of the FIR. Admittedly the name of the present appellant is not mentioned in the FIR. After going through entire chargesheet with the help of the learned APP and learned Counsel for the appellant it reveals that the role attributed to the present appellant is only on the basis of the statement of the co-accused. As far as his involvement is concerned neither the informant nor the eye witnesses have named him in the statement.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
Learned Counsel for opposite
Words: 495 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
One of our State which
Words: 934 | Time: 40 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-23 Dictation
Ex 498, Sir, I should like here to mention
Words: 831 | Time: 40 mins
Legal Dictation
Bulldozer justice is a euphemism
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins
Gujarat HighCourt Steno/PS Exam Dictation
In this regard, it is necessary
Words: 521 | Time: 25 mins
SSC Grade D C Steno Dictation
Reproduction and multiplication
Words: 836 | Time: 40 mins