Description

Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned APP for the State. Perused the investigation papers as well as the recitals of the FIR. Admittedly the name of the present appellant is not mentioned in the FIR. After going through entire chargesheet with the help of the learned APP and learned Counsel for the appellant it reveals that the role attributed to the present appellant is only on the basis of the statement of the co-accused. As far as his involvement is concerned neither the informant nor the eye witnesses have named him in the statement.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

Legal Dictation
It is manifest that to constitute
Words: 521 | Time: 25 mins
Legal Dictation
By the said judgment impugned
Words: 507 | Time: 25 mins
General Dictation
For several years the
Words: 513 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
In a batch of land acquisition cases, the Supreme Court
Words: 610 | Time: 30 mins
General Dictation
Students who graduate from a
Words: 603 | Time: 25 mins
Jharkhand & Patna Civil Court Dictation
The Supreme Court recently directed
Words: 512 | Time: 25 mins