Description

Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned APP for the State. Perused the investigation papers as well as the recitals of the FIR. Admittedly the name of the present appellant is not mentioned in the FIR. After going through entire chargesheet with the help of the learned APP and learned Counsel for the appellant it reveals that the role attributed to the present appellant is only on the basis of the statement of the co-accused. As far as his involvement is concerned neither the informant nor the eye witnesses have named him in the statement.

Leaderboard
Rank Students Marks
#1
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

250/300
#2
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

220/300
#3
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

200/300
#4
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

150/300
#5
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

230/300
#6
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#7
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#8
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#9
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
#10
Erin Gonzales

+91 95134 XXXXX

270/300
Available Exams

NCLT Exams Dictation
Since, the subject matter
Words: 489 | Time: 26 mins
Kailash Chandra Vol-3 Dictation
Since the the first summit
Words: 823 | Time: 40 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
There is no denying that
Words: 532 | Time: 25 mins
NCLT Exams Dictation
It is further submitted that
Words: 528 | Time: 27 mins
Legal Dictation
Bulldozer justice is a euphemism
Words: 514 | Time: 25 mins
Patna Civil Court Steno Dictation
In the 1990s, India faced a balance of payment
Words: 511 | Time: 25 mins